My Ramblings...

Monday, March 16, 2009

Simon And Garfunkel

Hello darkness, my old friend,
Ive come to talk with you again,
Because a vision softly creeping,
Left its seeds while I was sleeping,
And the vision that was planted in my brain
Still remains
Within the sound of silence.

In restless dreams I walked alone
Narrow streets of cobblestone,
neath the halo of a street lamp,
I turned my collar to the cold and damp
When my eyes were stabbed by the flash of
A neon light
That split the night
And touched the sound of silence.

And in the naked light I saw
Ten thousand people, maybe more.
People talking without speaking,
People hearing without listening,
People writing songs that voices never share
And no one deared
Disturb the sound of silence.

Fools said i,you do not know
Silence like a cancer grows.
Hear my words that I might teach you,
Take my arms that I might reach you.
But my words like silent raindrops fell,
And echoed
In the wells of silence

And the people bowed and prayed
To the neon God they made.
And the sign flashed out its warning,
In the words that it was forming.
And the signs said, the words of the prophets
Are written on the subway walls
And tenement halls.
And whisperd in the sounds of silence.

Friday, February 20, 2009

Response to a comment...

This is a response to a comment made in my previous post, "Nice guys...do finishes last"

I wanted to write a comment on that comment but it ended up as a two page comment and so I decided to change it into a blog post instead....

------------

True. Everyone is unique and changes come from the heart of a person. The thing is people change according to situation and so a comfortable change or an uncomfortable change largely depends on several factors. One of it is the acceptance of such a situation and the other is "alternative".

If one can accept situational changes then the person can adapt to the changes easily and without much impact.
For me, I thought I followed all the rules (both men and God). I thought I can handle the situation better due to the knowledge I gained from other people's failures. How wrong I was. I got no alternatives in front of me when the situation crashed in my eyes. When there is no "alternatives", nothing to look forward to, it will create a negative and inward self-destruction.

That's my frustration and my change to the "negative" persona. My hopes and dreams were dashed and so for most people in this kind of situation are usually the "unacceptable change" of behaviour. I build my world around a dream that I had when it is gone, and when there's no alternatives (at least I don't see one), I will go spiraling down but that's just me. I know I have to go up again but the thought of climbing up, after spending so much of energy (emotionally, mentally, etc), "it" becomes a major barrier.

Yes, prayer helps and I pray every day but I believe times like these, it's outside help that is important. Think about it, I cannot get up, therefore, I need someone from outside my chaos to help me pick up the pieces. God hasn't left me but it is I who choose to be left alone, I admit that. Probably that's my character. I don't mind getting myself into trouble so long as no one else gets hurt. I don't mind getting into problems that my friends are facing and go through with them. I don't mind but what I do mind is to have other people with me when I'm in trouble. That puts me into a spiraling downward shift. I even push God away (unconsciously) from my problems (I know I suppose to go to Him instead of pushing). I treat God like my friend and so I push Him away too. Like I said before, I am like that. I could get into serious trouble with that kind of thinking. Oh well...

I wrote this blog post because I was angry (angry at myself mainly) and angry at my situation and my life. Now I'm writing a response after picking up a bit more of myself.

True I don't like the situation and I don't like being so negative but I cannot accept my old, my personal theories of life. Those theories are gone and I got nothing forward to see and that's why I am so angry. I know in future I will be sober but I also know I may not be as "cheerful" in future.

Typical sentences/phrases that I've been getting from friends:

  • "You have to start thinking positively. You can choose to be positive in life or choose to be negative." Hmmm…why does “choosing to be positive", sounds like another way of saying "pretending that the situation never happened". But it did happen and why pretend nothing happened?


  • "Forget about the past and move on"... I wish I could forget, for every little thing that comes by WILL remind me that there was a time that it happened.


  • "Go out and do something to make you happy", that's the problem, my happiness derived from things not by "doing something" or "seeing something" or even "buying something" (a.k.a. retail therapy). My problem is that my dreams crashed and building it again is very, very hard. The shock is something that I've never experienced it before. Doing something may keep my mind of the situation but it's only temporary. When I reach back home, I look at my four walls...that's what I see, felt and remembered that my hope were dashed and need to pick up again.

Some parts of me were asking, it is worth picking up again and start building your hopes again? Will my dreams get shattered again in future? In life, there is no certainty right? So is it worth getting my hopes up and getting shattered all over again? Will I get the same 99% complete and then got cut off? That's why it is so draining. That is why I am angry at myself and my life in general.

In time I will pick up the pieces and start re-building but I don't think I can build the same type of dream with the same level of hope and with the same positive feel. Everyone has their own theories of life due to their experiences and experiences of others and so mine is shattered and needs a re-build. That's all I can do and since the situational changes me, my re-build (I foresee) will not be as "happy" or as "positive" as what I had intentionally.

However (have to write something positive here otherwise I'll never hear the end of it), life is also unpredictable, may be, just a 0.0000000000001% chance that I may find something along the way to inspire me to re-built my dreams and be equally "positive" or "happy". Who knows? Until that chance comes along and changes me, I'll just do it "my way". Anyway, I'm just expressing my anger and my thoughts for now.

Brian. Over and out.

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Nice guys...do finishes last

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nice_guy

Nice guys finishes last, that was the saying that I want to erase in my life but I couldn’t and fail and failed badly. I keep thinking that being a nice guy in a world that scoffs at nice guys is the right thing to do since there are so little nice guys out there. However, I find it tough being a nice guy and it really does not pays. Ideally that what everyone likes but realistically speaking, it can never satisfy the requirement of being a "man" in this day and age.

Girls like nice guys. That is for sure but they never like nice guys in the long run. In the short run it is good to have a "nice guy" but in the long run, women just get more depressed being with "nice guys" (most women I believe feels like that). Why are they depressed with "nice guys"? This is what I get from girls (my own but small and quick research) when asked what their perception of “a nice guy” is.

  • nice guys are boring
  • too predictable
  • too soft
  • not adventurous enough
  • not aggressive enough
  • dependable but usually last to be called
  • etc
So there you have it, the negatives of being a nice guy. It is an irony since there are so little nice guys out there and more people likes nice guys but being nice is just an illusion that people would take you seriously in the long run.


My conclusion? If you are a nice guy to begin with, you can continue to become a nice guy and your life will be as mundane (ordinary sense) as ever but your dreams will never be fulfilled. If you change from a nice guy to a “nice guy with an edge” is best but what is that edge? I’m still wondering what that means. Mysterious? May cause suspicion in the long run and thus causing some distrust. Nice guy that is tough? May wrongly show you at times and you’ll lose the nice guy image. Aggressive? Geee... don't know about that one. Guys who knows exactly what they want? Sounds like another word for stubborn.

"Finding the balance" is what people say to me. It may be true but what is the balance between "nice guys" and "not-so-nice guys" or even the "bad boy" image. Finding the balance is a cliché, for it is an answer that is true and yet cannot pin-point the exact answer for it.

"Be who you are" is a funny answer don't you think? The irony of life is that life is ever changing and if you don't change, you're left behind and if you do not change then you'll always do the same old mistakes. When you do change, friends and families would come to you and tell you not to change and just "be who you are". When you find that your life is as miserable as before and you wanted to change to overcome those areas you don't like and these people would come up to you and say, "just be happy with who you are". What they wanted to say is "I like you just the way you are". Yup. Unfortunately, I don't like being where I am or I don't like being "Just the way I am"; taken advantage of, being laughed at, etc.

For my new rule in life, if you don't like who you are, change. To heck with the people who tells you that "I like you just the way you are". If they are true friends, then they'll catch you when you try to change. Even if a person changes and turned 180 in life and falls (stepped into the "dark side"), it is their decision and friends, especially true friends, will always be there to help you to change back or even to find a balance.

Changing from a “nice guy” image to a “not-so-nice guy” is tough. Tough on you as a nice guy and tough on your old friends, if you do want to move into this direction, better find new friends because your old friends may think you’re doing drugs or something.

Okay that's enough from me for now. I know it sounds like an angry post and it is slightly so (at least I am honest).

Over and out.

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

January 20th, 2009

Today is just like any other day and I went about doing my work as a trainer. I find that today I was better in terms of handling the participants. However, it was negatively accepted. What I wanted for the participants is to remember the information and not just memorizing or worse, don't want to remember but only wants the answer for that moment. My goal is to have the participants remember the information. All I did was to point the answers from the books; information is in the books as I didn't pluck the information out from the air. I made them read the books as the books were theirs and by doing so, they may remember through experiences by visual, touch, etc. My methods may be crude in their eyes but they never see the results.

After thinking about it. I think this job is no longer suitable for me. I have killed what I have enjoyed (in my eyes). I have become someone that is ineffective in delivering (in their eyes). Perhaps it is time for me to move on. To where? I have no idea yet but not now. I still have objectives to meet. I still have two more hurdles to leap over before I hang up my license to teach.

It is the end result they don't see. I believe what they see is a horrible trainer. I suppose from the "customer's point of view" they are right. If they cannot understand/remember the information given, then I have failed. By that, they are right and I am wrong.

Oh to be passionate about teaching is tough. I want to swing my sword from one end to another without fear. I want to push them to newer heights, to bring them to a higher level of understanding. How I wish I could. I have failed as a trainer without a doubt. Even with proper technical backgrounds, the delivery is important and I have failed the delivery portion.

I'd remember when I was a younger trainer, in another company, with another "brand". I'd remember I was a young pup with very little knowledge and my deliverance was good as I was talking in simple terms but "substance" was very much lacking. I was banking on my deliverance to gain points and I did. Now, after years of accumulation of "substance", I lost my "deliverance". Why is this happening? I don't know. Probably because I wanted to impart all I know to them. Pushing, rushing and when the day ended I would ask myself, "for what?" They don't look happy and neither do I feel happy. My passion in trying to teach, impart knowledge was more than they could absorb. I have failed. So many years I was without "substance" and now, when I do have "substance", I was trying to push to them the same information/skills that I have gained. A waste. A huge waste of effort in my part. I have failed.

I would like to find a balance in pleasing the participants and for them to gain knowledge in return. I wish I could but I could not, I have failed. Yet, in all my failures, I am still here in this line of work. Funny, no? I no longer have the drive to teach fully as today onwards, I'll keep a conscious mind that there is no point in pushing. Pleasing the participants is the most important in my line of work. I remember what my senior told me a long time ago, "Impart 40% and make sure they remember 90% rather than imparting 90% and only remembered 40%."

The values looks the same but it is not. The participants would "feel" as if they are much better when they first come in (if adopting impart 40% while remembering 90%). The particpants would feel that they have gained and thus feeling good. However, if I were to adopt the second method (imparting 90% while they only remember 40%), the participants would feel they have not gained anything. By delivering at maximum knowledge possible, it would be very impratical too as the participants could not/would not be able to retain it. How I wish I could swing a full swing and swing to my fullest and hope they may gain all of it. How I wish indeed.

Yes, everyone has his/her own learning pace but my heart, filled with passion, cannot contain such knowledge and pushes me to impart my knowledge. My own heartful desire is my own poison. This year, I hope that I would kill my passion in training so that I could continue my journey as a trainer for a short while more. I cannot find solace in knowing that one of twenty participants could gain all that I wanted to show. I cannot hope that one of twenty would be able to see what I am doing. I must "hold back" and ensure they would remember 40%. I feel that I am cheating by doing so but I must do it for the sake of my job and my frustration.

Peace.

Over and out.

Wednesday, January 07, 2009

Starting Again

This is Brian Chew, reporting in January beginning of the year of 2009.


It has been too long since the last owner wrote anything on this blog. The last entry recorded for publicized ariticles and/or thoughts was dated on 20th of April last year. There were some unpublished written pieces but were held back from publishing due to incomplete writings or completed articles that were unsure what consequences would it have if the articles were to be published out.


Since the last published article, the owner of the blog has pretty much left it all alone till now. Some have asked, what cause the owner to start publishing again? This question was brought to the blogger Brian Chew's attention.


The returned blogger responded with, ""To answer the question what caused me to start writing again, the question of why I started the blog and what caused me to stop needs to be answered first."


Continuing he said, "Initially, I believe that I could express better in writing. I could formulate words and sentences and describe those thoughts and feelings much easier in writing than I do on the spot. I have lost the touch last year and felt that I've lost the desire to write anymore. Now, I have more time and with new experiences that I have gained, I found the desire to write again."


Adding to that he said, "My writing skills were not so good to begin with and after leaving my blog for so long, it has gone beyond rusty. My objective is like to try to be better in writing articles that could/would express my feelings and experiences in exact words. The bonus part is to have comments left behind by the readers. Now, as I looked at some of my previous written articles, it was indeed better towards the last few published articles than the earlier written ones."


"Now to answer your question of what caused me to start writing again. It's because igne natura renovatur integra (through fire, nature is reborn whole). I've experience some things in my life that I want to share and my desire to write was reborn due to these experiences and so I re-start my blog again." He concluded with an apprehensive smile.


It is to note that the owner of the blog has many friends before and some of these articles were written about them or of them. These articles could impact positively on one and may cause a negative impact on the other. Such is the nature of these kind of writings published in internet.


What articles would blogger Brian Chew publish in the following articles for year 2009 is anyone's guess. However, there is one known fact, he is not as fearful to publish as before. Stay tuned to this blog to find out.


This is Brian Chew reporting on the returned blogger Brian Chew owner of My Ramblings at http://mygrumblings.blogspot.com.


Over and out.

Monday, April 21, 2008

Yuck Berries

I wrote this piece and showed it to someone and then was commented that it was written too dark and thus missing my point. So I re-write it and send to some MORE people and seemed that it is okay. So this is the piece.

-----------------------------------------------

I sometimes wonder if people could see through me "yuck berries" (a term that I've learnt in a training seminar - many, many, MANY moons ago, just after I reached puberty). Yuck berries, if I can recall, is a term use for "ugliness of the heart". Just like your arteries being blocked by your "bad" cholesterol, "bad" personalities also clogs up your good heart (referring personality and not the blood pumping muscle).

"He is a good person = he has a good heart."

I have heard about those lines and more. These people felt "touched" by the other persons' actions and felt some "warmth" within their own hearts. Nice. Only problem is, is that the only measurement? What else? Perhaps. I don't know. I've seen people that have "good hearts" with "bad intentions" and also vice versa. However, I am not going to talk about "good hearts" vs. "bad hearts" but more what is "yuck berries" do to a "good hearted" person.

The “yuck berries” is, as said earlier, like your bad cholesterol. Things like your mind (thinking), your actions (decisions), your personality (behaviour), and other components that make up "your-individual-self", is generating the "yuck berries". If you have good mind, actions, personality and others, then you have little "yuck berries" and thus little to worry about. The "yuck berries", is never 100% gone. Just how little or much is it. No man (or woman) is perfect. Just like a normal, "healthy" body, the amount of cholesterol is equal to how many good cholesterol and how many bad cholesterol is in your body and you cannot remove ALL bad cholesterol, just controlling, reducing the bad ones while leaving the good ones roam free in your body.

The worrying part is when your "yuck berries" becomes uncontrollable, becomes too much. It will "clog" up your "heart" (referring to mind, actions, personality, etc) and covering it and made it "black". Your "good" heart is still there, just covered. However, if left uncontrolled even more, the gunk that covers it will cast a shadow that is so long and so big that you cannot escape unless you go to another country or die (by nature, murdered or self).

Your good natured heart will be covered if you have accumulated enough "yuck berries". Corruption of a person's nature doesn't happen overtime and is very, very subtle (but I am not going to talk about that point though). What made a God-fearing, wife-loving, church-going, law-abiding man (or woman) fell from grace and became a "bad" man (or woman)? Affairs, greed (money), position (power) and many other factors are involved in the “construction” of the “yuck berries”.

I often wondered why King David fell so badly. He was at his height of his power. He has lots of wives of his own. Yet, he couldn't help it when he saw Bathsheba, who was also married (at that time ) to another man. David covets, had affair with Bathsheba (thus breaking his marriage covenant with his other wives and God), and plotted the death of Bathsheba's husband (thus committing the sin of killing). I will not go into a debate about King David but just to serve as an example. After all, King David was known as "the man who is after God's heart" and YET he failed at a point, though later recovered but most people ONLY remembered that “bad” point in his life.

In connection to the "yuck berries", King David's God-fearing heart was covered and covered deep enough that his "God-fearing" heart was no longer in control over his life. The “yuck berries” were in controlled BUT that does not mean that King David's original God-fearing heart was gone. I do not believe that a "good man" can become a "bad" man and lost his "goodness" completely. I never believe that; somewhere in there, deep behind the "yuck berries", lies his heart.

"I felt the goodness in you", Luke Skywalker said to Darth Vader (his father).

I am not here to talk about pushing away the "yuck berries" to reveal the true heart below. That can be from a religious point of view, counselling point of view and many others or even combinations of the methods. What I am writing is the effects of the "yuck berries" AFTER (yup not during) the heart is cleared of it.

The problem being human is that most (about 95%) people remember bad stuff more than good, and sometimes only the bad. A "changed" person, i.e. “yuck berries” not covering the heart anymore, WILL always be looked upon, stigmatized and TREATED as when the person is discovered with "yuck berries". Here, I am talking about if a person wants to change, tries to change and changed, somehow or rather, the person is STILL branded with "yuck berries". It is very hard to break that perception of others. I even dare to say "impossible" for some people to change that perception.

The "yuck berries" are gone, the "good heart" returns BUT the people does not change their views. I can understand yet I find it hard to accept the reason why people cannot change their views. Remember, I am talking about a good-natured person that turned bad and then good again. This means that the surrounding people knows that he/she was a good person originally and later turned bad and turned him/her down when he/she is trying to be good again. I find that hard to accept. I have no arguments if the surrounding people do not have a "good past" to compare with and so cannot do a comparison. From that point of view, I agree with “rejection”.

A convict became an ex-convict trying to find a new "beginning" to forget the bad past is abandoned by people that he "knew" before. I know and understand that "trust" is gone. But is it? If it is gone, why cannot it be "re-created" or "renewed"? After all, zero trust was gained initially too when a relationship (friendship or otherwise) was first discovered and formed. What has he/she done that deserves nothing but "a cold death". Short of "life destroying" stuff (rape, murder, physical/mental abuse, etc) is there any hope of forgiveness and a possible renewal?

A moments' of the person's life was covered by the "yuck berries" and thus cause the heart-felt disturbance by relationship(s) of his/her love ones, families and friends. That "yuck berry" moment, also may destroyed his/her reputation/friendship/career/life. Isn't it enough that he/she has suffered and now trying to come back to the people that he/she is trying to proof that the "yuck berries" are gone?

The question often thrown back is, "how can we trust him/her again?" or "how do we know that he/she is changed?" My answer is a question for that question, "how do you know that he/she is NOT changed?" Follow that by, "have he/she done something so grave and bad that he/she cannot be accepted into the circle of friendship yet again?" Remember, I am talking about person that had pushed the "yuck berries" away and WANTED to return back into the circle.

So what about me? If anyone knows me, then would know my answer. I tend to forgive others quite easily. Unless it is a grave "sin", I usually forgive and embrace easily too. Yes, by doing that I also allow myself to be trampled on with by the same person stabbing my heart a few times and more but I always use myself as a measurement to learn to forgive. Yes, I done things that I wish I could turn back the clock and change my decisions/acts/words otherwise but it is in the past and the “yuck berries” cleared. How unfortunate for myself that I cannot forgive my own "self" as easily. It is me, it is myself that I cannot forgive. My circle of friends? I don’t know…most of those that I did wrong, still gives me the “branding”, at least from my perspective of them of me. What do I think of this? Hmmm… it will be another session.

This is Brian. Over and out.

Wednesday, April 09, 2008

Win some...lose some...

I, like most of you readers, met lots of people through out our lives. Some of these people have become acquaintances and some developed into friends. In those circle of friends, some have moved into our lives even deeper and become close friends. In the "best friend" category, some people do have it and some don't. I once asked an acquaintance of mine about the "best friend" concept. She shook her head and tells me she doesn't believe in the "best of friends" concept. I understand and accept and after all, there is nothing wrong with believing or disbelieving that concept.

A slight difference in substance in knowing made the distinction between a stranger and an acquaintance; personal information. For me, I would declare a person is an acquaintance if that person knows who I am in person and pretty much general information and nothing more AND I know that person in pretty much the same manner. I would NOT call that person an acquaintance IF I know that person and general information but that person doesn’t even knows my name. It is like Obama/Clinton and me situation. I know everything that is able to know from the internet about that person but he/she knows squat about me.

The closer layer of my life would be friends. These are the people that I care up to a certain level and share with (share my laughs, my joy, my intelligence (artificial if you ask me personally and some of my personal life). Sometimes I wish I could share more stuff with these people and would consider them as close friends. Unfortunately (or is it fortunately) you have to be careful with your friends (hence the phrase “choose your friends carefully).

Though sometimes it may not be intentional, I may have left the people from my "Friends" group out from my “Closer Friends” group. Most of the time, I feel bad. Most of the time I feel that I am the one suppose to call them, establish a better relationship and etc. Feel like I’m letting them down somewhat. But I never do it intentionally. Yes, I do admit that I screw up in some friendships. I am not proud of that. Sometimes I just wish I could turn back the clock but reality strikes in and we just have to move on. To those friends, I only wish for your forgiveness. I screw up, not you. Off hand, there are three that I could clearly remember. The others, I can’t or didn’t realize it. I’m sorry once again.

Well I guess the next category of “closer group of friends” is self explanatory. Almost anything, everything could be shared in this group of friends. The only thing is (for me per se) is that I talk certain topics more intimately to one than the other. I glad that I still have some of these group of friends who laughed with me, shares my pipe dreams, my lame jokes, serious matters and whatnots. It is to these groups that I fear that I would lose the most. I fear of losing my friends in the “Friends” category too but I fear of losing “Closer Friends” category even more.

What fears me most are those friends in the “Best of friends” category. These people I would even sell my kidney for them (just don’t push me into doing it okay guys). These people know who I am referring to.

However, no matter what category of friendship the friends are in (except for “Strangers” and “Acquaintances”), I always try to help them. As much as I can and the limits of which depends on the request but I always try. That is a promise I give.

Anyway, I’m getting all "emo" now after reading what I’ve wrote and so I’ll be signing off for now.

Brian Chew over and out.